A first-hand account of discrimination
Testing Circle is a small IT recruitment company headquartered in London, England. In 2014, I stumbled across an
advertisement for a graduate role. I felt happy that it didn't require a subject-specific degree (despite having
one), free training would be provided and I would greatly flourish in this role. Bear in mind that I was going
through a tough spell; in terms of my health, family and financial situation. I knew that landing this job would
alleviate this troublesome spell. Thus, I seized the opportunity by applying for it.
The company invited me for an assessment day. They said my speech impediment (which I disclosed) would not make me less valuable, indicating they would be willing to hire someone with such an impediment. Admittedly, I did not feel confident I would probably land the job due to issues I was facing plus the increasingly difficult competition. Nevertheless, this opportunity was not worth ignoring, so accepted the invitation.
The morning of the assessment day. I felt stomach pains as well as negative thoughts about how the day would fare. I
felt depressed about my life in general and over the improbability of securing the job. I knew what it was like to
endure rejection and didn't want to experience it again. My desire for success did not preclude me from attending. I
was under a lot of pressure to perform well, knowing my personal problems would curtail, should I land the job. In
hindsight, the wisest thing I should have done was rearrange the appointment.
Having punctually reached the venue, a number of events were scheduled. Some of which included a presentation and
interview. When I began the presentation, my speech was worse than normal, owing to my lack of wellness. I felt
embarrassed and awkward, which exacerbated my speech. Their body language suggested they weren't pleased with my
performance. I felt they disliked me and perceived me as a joke. Afterwards, I was relieved it was finally over. I
couldn't believe how uneasy I felt during the ordeal and how they reacted.
The interview was next. At this point, I felt mentally despondent but realised there was light at the end of the
tunnel. I thought I might be able to change the interviewers' initial perceptions of me by flourishing in the
interview. Two people conducted the interview. Sadly, it was even worse. They made disapproving gestures indicative
of their dissatisfaction of me (i.e. folded arms, glazed expressions, etc). Such feelings aggravated my
concentration, speech and ability to quickly think of good answers to their questions. When the interview was over,
the assessment day came to a close. My embarrassment was stretched to the breaking point. What I gathered the most
was a negative perception they had of me. How they perceived me indicated they didn't want to pursue my application
given my speech.
A few days later, my application was declined. I was keen to hear constructive feedback and was told they would give
this according to their policy, but weeks followed without a response despite chasing them up. Their failure to offer
feedback despite assuring they would, contradicting their own policy and reactions to me during the assessment day is
best explained by the notion that they discriminated against me, due to my speech. This is not what
I wanted to subjectively believe. I wanted to believe I was unsuccessful for any other reason apart from
that. However, I couldn't rationally accept any other conclusion apart from the one which was the most hurtful and
disappointing.
Why have I written this review? For a number of reasons.
Testing Circle will not want to believe discrimination occurred given their business objectives to flourish and beat the competition. Also, it doesn't feel good to hold a negative view, especially if specific stakeholders lack proof. However, this is not an intellectual reason to reject the undesirable conclusion I have made. I myself do not want to believe this, but truth hurts.